T Raja Singh sparks controversy in MP with beheading remark, ‘Vande Mataram’ warning
The Telangana MLA made the remarks while addressing a Hindu Garjana rally organised to mark the birth anniversary of Shivaji in Chhindwara on Monday evening.
The Board has termed the decision unconstitutional and contrary to religious freedom.
Photo: Wikipedia
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has strongly objected to the Central government’s recent notification mandating the recitation of all verses of Vande Mataram at official functions and in schools before the National Anthem, Jana Gana Mana.
The Board has termed the decision unconstitutional and contrary to religious freedom.
Advertisement
In a press statement here on Thursday, Board’s General Secretary Maulana Mohammed Fazlur Rahim Mujaddidi expressed strong opposition to the government’s decision, calling it unconstitutional, against religious freedom and secular values, contrary to Supreme Court judgment, and directly conflicting with the religious beliefs of Muslims. He stated that the decision is therefore completely unacceptable to Muslims.
Advertisement
The Maulana noted that, following Rabindranath Tagore’s advice and deliberations in the Constituent Assembly, it had been agreed that only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram would be used. He said that a secular government cannot forcibly impose the beliefs or teachings of one religion upon followers of other religions.
He added that the song was written in the context of Bengal and contains references to the worship veneration of Durga and other deities. Whatever the political considerations behind implementing this decision ahead of the West Bengal elections, Muslims cannot accept it, as it directly conflicts with their faith. A Muslim worships only One God, Allah, without partners, and Islam does not permit any form of associating partners with God.
The General Secretary further stated that Indian courts have also held that the other verses are inconsistent with secular values and have restricted their recitation. Therefore, the Board demands that the Central government immediately withdraw the notification; otherwise, the Board will challenge it in the court.
Advertisement